The stove was still warm in the kitchen when investigators finally stepped back and looked at the house as a crime scene, but by then it was too late to be certain of anything. On the morning of November 23, 2010, Dale Brunner had called the Silverthorne Police Department to report that his wife, Stephanie Roller, had vanished during the night. She had gone out for a walk in a light jacket, through heavy snow, and never come back. Her car was still parked in front of the house.

She had taken no purse, no money, no keys. Only her phone and her laptop, according to Dale. For hours, no one had any idea where she was. Then, three days later, a search team member walking the river not far from her home noticed something odd between the rocks.
It looked like an unusually large pile of snow. When he moved closer, he realized there was a body beneath it. Stephanie Roller was born on May 9, 1969, in Colorado. She grew up in a large family with two brothers and three sisters, and from an early age she was in constant motion.
She loved skiing, surfing, and just about any other sport she could try, and at one point she even took up skydiving. Her family and friends described her as energetic and full of life, someone always searching for new experiences and never afraid to try anything different. After high school, she went to the University of California, where she studied social ecology. After graduating, she moved to Oregon and began working in research for the Forest Service.
She spent some time working at a ski resort, and there she met a photographer named Dale Brunner. Their relationship developed quickly, and they decided to move together to the small town of Silverthorne, Colorado. Once they settled, Stephanie found work with the county, supervising construction projects, while continuing to pursue her favorite hobby, dance. Soon after arriving in Silverthorne, she found a local dance studio, and over time she began teaching ballroom dancing herself.
A few years after moving, Stephanie married Dale, and the couple had three children, two daughters and a son. By 2010, Stephanie was forty-one years old, had lived in Silverthorne for about fifteen years, and had earned a reputation in town as an active, sociable, and positive person. For years, life seemed to be going well. Then, in a single morning, everything changed.
Dale told police that he and Stephanie had been at home with their children the previous night. Around ten o’clock, a minor argument broke out between them. Afterward, Stephanie said she wanted to go for a short walk to clear her head. About half an hour later, Dale heard the front door close, and that was the last time he saw her.
What made the situation even more alarming was that Stephanie had gone out wearing only a light jacket, despite the cold and the heavy snowfall. Her car remained parked outside, and she had left behind her bag, her money, and her keys. According to Dale, the only things she took were her phone and her laptop. Stephanie did not return home that night, but Dale did not call anyone until the next morning.
He later explained that he had initially wanted to give her some privacy, assuming she had possibly gone to stay with a friend or booked a hotel room to spend the night alone. His real concern only began when he woke up the next morning and realized she still had not come back. He called her phone several times, but every call went straight to voicemail. He woke the children, got them ready for school, and walked them to the bus.
Then, around 8:45 a. m. , he finally called the police to report Stephanie missing. Officers began checking nearby hospitals and hotels, but there was no trace of her.
Soon afterward, Stephanie’s friends and family joined the search alongside local rescue teams. They combed the area around the house, checking bridges, riverbanks, wooded areas, and any other place she might have gone. Her friends also went to local hotels, hoping she had simply decided to spend the night alone. But as the search continued, no one found any sign of Stephanie.
One detail in particular caught the police’s attention: there were no footprints in the snow indicating which way she had gone after leaving the house. At the same time, snow had been falling heavily all night, so investigators realized any tracks could easily have been covered. With the cold weather and hours of silence from Stephanie, the police began to doubt that she had simply chosen to leave for a while. Yet after days of searching, they had no real leads and no clear idea what had happened to her.
The Silverthorne Police Department was small, so investigators quickly requested help from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation. On Friday, November 26, three days after Stephanie disappeared, one of the search team members was checking the river not far from her home when he noticed what looked like a large amount of snow among the rocks. It seemed strange and out of place. As he approached, he realized a body lay beneath it.
Police soon confirmed it was Stephanie. She had been found just a few minutes’ walk from her house. Most of her body lay on its back in the freezing water, partially covered by snow, which may explain why search teams had not found her sooner. Stephanie was barefoot and almost completely undressed.
Her long-sleeved shirt lay beside her, still caught around one arm, while the rest of the clothing she was presumed to have been wearing when she left the house had vanished. While investigators waited for the autopsy results, they began considering three possible explanations for what had happened. There was a small bridge near where Stephanie was found, and police learned she had crossed it often during her walks. One possibility was that she had gone out late that night in the snowstorm and accidentally fallen into the river.
Another was that she had done so deliberately after her quarrel with Dale. The third was that someone had attacked her near the bridge. The autopsy quickly ruled out the first two. Stephanie had no injuries on the soles of her feet, even though walking barefoot in that area would almost certainly have caused some damage.
More importantly, the medical examiner found a severe head injury that appeared to have been caused by a strong blow, along with signs that someone had strangled her with their hands. Stephanie was still alive when she fell into the river, and her death was ultimately attributed to a combination of her injuries, hypothermia, and drowning. At that point, police realized they were no longer dealing with an accident. Everything pointed to someone having brutally assaulted Stephanie and then left her in the freezing river, only a few hundred meters from her home.
Investigators began scrutinizing her personal life, and naturally the first person they focused on was her husband. There were already aspects of Dale’s behavior during the search that raised questions. As noted, he had waited nearly eleven hours before reporting Stephanie missing, which seemed odd in itself. But that was not the only striking thing.
After police arrived, Dale showed little involvement in the search for his wife. About six hours after reporting her disappearance, one of Stephanie’s friends came to the house and learned that Dale had not gone out looking for her and had rarely contacted any of her close friends. Instead, he began talking about Stephanie’s flaws and complaining about problems in their marriage. On the second day of the search, Dale was brought to the police station for another interview.
When an officer entered the room, she found him asleep in a chair while his wife was still missing. During the interview itself, he seemed perfectly calm and kept repeating that Stephanie might come home on her own. Investigators also began noticing inconsistencies in parts of his account. At first, Dale said that after Stephanie left, he stayed home and did not go out to look for her.
But during one of his later interviews, he suddenly changed that part of the story, claiming he had indeed gone out and tried to find her. More disturbing information emerged when investigators began talking to the people closest to Stephanie. According to them, by the time of her death, her marriage to Dale was on the verge of collapse. About six weeks before her death, Stephanie had watched Dale strike one of their children several times as punishment.
Furious about what had happened, she went to court and obtained a temporary restraining order preventing Dale from coming near her or their children, forcing him to leave the house. But that incident was not the only reason for Stephanie’s fear of him. During the court hearing, she told the judge that Dale had also been aggressive with her before. According to Stephanie, during one argument, he grabbed her by the neck and threatened to kill her if she tried to leave him.
She also said she feared how Dale would react if he realized she was planning to take the children and go. Shortly before her death, she told one of her friends something even more alarming: if anything happened to her, Dale would be responsible. Still, about two weeks after obtaining the protection order, Stephanie asked the court to lift it, and Dale returned home. From the outside, it might have looked like the two were trying to fix things, but on November 1, Stephanie filed for divorce formally.
Then, just two days before her death, Stephanie tried to leave again. She took the children and left the house, but hours earlier, for reasons that remain unclear, she returned to Dale. By now, investigators were seeing a very disturbing picture. In the weeks before her death, Stephanie had tried to obtain legal protection from her husband, told people about his threats, and taken steps to end the marriage.
On top of all that, the last person known to have seen her before she left the house was Dale himself. But despite all the suspicious circumstances surrounding him, the police faced a serious problem: they had no direct evidence linking him to Stephanie’s murder. There was no clear crime scene inside the home, no trace of DNA on Stephanie’s body tying Dale to the attack, and no murder weapon. In the meantime, Dale strongly denied any connection to his wife’s death and insisted he had never hurt her.
He also gave police another name to investigate. He told them about a man named Ron, whom he claimed had been having an affair with Stephanie. According to Dale, Stephanie herself had confessed to the affair. Some of Stephanie’s friends had also heard the name Ron.
Shortly before her disappearance, she had told them she met a man she believed was her soulmate. Ron was a local physical therapist she had met through dance. When police called Ron in for questioning, he made no attempt to hide the relationship. He admitted that he and Stephanie had formed a close emotional bond, though he claimed it had never become physical.
The two had exchanged letters and romantic messages online, but there was one major problem: Ron was married and had no intention of leaving his wife. In fact, shortly before Stephanie disappeared, Ron decided to end their relationship. He first told her by message, but Stephanie preferred to talk face to face. So, on the evening of November 22, they met in the parking lot of a local store.
The meeting took place only about five hours before Stephanie disappeared. Ron told police that Stephanie tried to persuade him to change his mind, but he made it clear he was determined to stay with his wife and try to repair his marriage. This gave investigators another person who had seen Stephanie hours before her disappearance, someone who had just rejected her and had his own family, and therefore had every reason to keep the relationship hidden. But then things became even more complicated.
Investigators learned something Ron’s wife, Cynthia, had said while Stephanie was still missing, even before her body was found. Cynthia told someone she really hoped Stephanie was dead. Later, she reportedly said she hoped Stephanie would rot in hell. Despite these statements, Cynthia insisted she knew nothing about her husband’s relationship with Stephanie and claimed the police were the ones who first told her about it.
But investigators were not ready to simply believe her. They had to consider the possibility that Cynthia had learned of the affair earlier and might have wanted to get rid of the woman her husband was involved with. So police now began investigating three people who potentially had motive: Dale, Ron, and Cynthia. Ron and Cynthia said they had been at home together the night of Stephanie’s murder, but that presented an obvious problem: their alibis depended entirely on each other, so investigators were not ready to accept their account without further verification.
They were later asked to undergo polygraph tests, and the results only deepened investigators’ suspicions. Both Ron and Cynthia failed the test. But once again, police faced the same problem they had with Dale: no matter how suspicious they seemed, investigators could not find any evidence linking any of them to Stephanie’s murder. Investigators continued looking into all three suspects for about a month, but they eventually began to doubt that Ron or Cynthia was involved in Stephanie’s death.
Despite everything that had initially raised suspicion about them, police could not find any evidence connecting either of them to the crime. That line of investigation led nowhere, so investigators turned their attention back to Dale. At that point, they believed he was the most likely person responsible. But suspicious behavior in a troubled marriage was not enough to arrest someone for murder.
Police had no fingerprints, no DNA, and no other physical evidence directly linking Dale to what had happened. Investigators continued working through the final hours of Stephanie’s life, talking to people who knew the couple well. Those conversations revealed another alarming detail. One of Dale’s close friends said that after Stephanie confessed her feelings for another man, Dale began saying strange things.
According to the friend, Dale said more than once that he wished Stephanie would die somehow, perhaps of a heart attack or a car accident. At the time, the friend had not paid much attention, thinking Dale was only joking. But that was not the end of it. Shortly afterward, police received an unexpected tip.
A former girlfriend of Dale’s called the hotline set up for the case. She had dated him in the early 1990s, and after hearing about Stephanie’s murder, she decided to tell police about an incident from years before. According to the woman, during a heated argument, Dale had once thrown her to the ground, wrapped his hands around her neck, and threatened to kill her. This was especially concerning because Stephanie had also been strangled, and the injuries to her neck indicated the use of considerable force.
As investigators dug deeper into Dale and Stephanie’s marriage, people close to Stephanie began telling similar stories. Shortly before her death, Stephanie had finally started confiding in her friends about several incidents involving Dale. She said that during one argument, he pushed her against a wall, grabbed her neck, and threatened her. She also described an incident years earlier, when she was pregnant, when Dale threw her onto the bed and pressed his knee against her stomach.
Police had no way to prove those old incidents after the fact, but together they painted a disturbing picture. According to several women, when Dale became angry, he grabbed their necks and threatened to kill them. Investigators also obtained clearer evidence from Stephanie herself: a recording of her final court hearing regarding the protection order. During the hearing, Stephanie told the judge that Dale had put his hand around her neck before and shouted that he would kill her if she left him.
She explained that she had never forgotten that threat and that she had always feared what he might do if she ended the relationship for good. Then investigators found another important piece of evidence, this time directly connected to the night of Stephanie’s death. As noted, Dale claimed Stephanie had taken only her phone and laptop on her walk, and neither had been found. Investigators began requesting records from the companies that provided Stephanie’s digital services, including her email account.
There they discovered something interesting: an unfinished draft message in her email, started shortly before her disappearance. The message was addressed to Ron, and in it Stephanie told him she wanted to continue the relationship and was not ready to give him up. But the most important thing was not the content of the message; it was the time the last version of that draft had been automatically saved, around eleven o’clock at night. That created a serious problem for Dale’s account.
He had told police he heard Stephanie leave the house sometime between ten and ten thirty. But according to the email records, at least half an hour later, she appeared to still be working on the message. Because Stephanie was writing to Ron again about her feelings and trying to persuade him to see her once more, investigators began to wonder whether that had led to a final argument between her and Dale. Their hypothesis was that Dale may have realized Stephanie was still trying to continue her relationship with Ron even after returning home, lost his temper, and attacked her.
Police could not determine exactly what weapon had been used to strike Stephanie, but the laptop Dale himself claimed she had taken on her walk could have caused that type of injury, leading investigators to consider whether he had hit her with it and then disposed of the laptop along with her phone and missing clothes. By that time, Dale had waited nearly eleven hours before reporting Stephanie missing, contributed little to the search, changed details of his account of that night more than once, and refused to take a polygraph test when police asked. In early January 2011, police formally named Dale the primary suspect in Stephanie’s murder for the first time. However, they faced the same problem as before.
Investigators were convinced of his involvement but still lacked the physical evidence they believed would allow them to charge him. So, on January 5, prosecutors asked a judge to convene a grand jury, which could review all the evidence, hear witness testimony, and determine whether the circumstantial case against Dale was strong enough to proceed with criminal charges. Over the following months, the grand jury reviewed testimony from Stephanie’s friends and family, her statements in court, the history of her marriage, accounts from Dale’s former girlfriends, email records, and everything investigators had gathered about the final hours before her death. Then, on August 3, 2011, more than eight months after Stephanie’s murder, the grand jury issued an indictment allowing prosecutors to charge Dale with second-degree murder, two counts of first-degree assault, and three counts of tampering with physical evidence.
But even after his arrest, the biggest problem in the case remained. Prosecutors had no clear crime scene, no murder weapon, no DNA evidence, and no witness who saw Dale attack Stephanie. The entire case against him rested almost entirely on circumstantial evidence. Now prosecutors had to convince a jury that this evidence, taken together, was enough.
Nearly a year passed between the indictment and the start of the trial. Dale was released on bail during that period and continued to insist on his innocence while his lawyers sought to have the charges dismissed. By the time the case reached court, the prosecution had gathered some additional details that helped clarify the circumstances of Stephanie’s final night. Among the people investigators spoke to was the couple’s eldest daughter, who was nine years old when her mother died.
She said that on the night of November 22, she heard her parents arguing, and around nine o’clock she entered Stephanie’s bedroom to ask for help with her homework. This meant that, aside from Dale, the daughter was the last person known to have seen Stephanie alive inside the house. The prosecution was also allowed to present testimony from Dale’s former girlfriends. As noted, one of them had called police herself after Stephanie’s murder, but by the time of the trial, the prosecution also heard from another woman who said Dale had grabbed her by the neck when he became very angry.
Based on everything they had gathered, prosecutors put forward what they believed was the most likely account of what happened that night. They argued that Dale and Stephanie had argued again on the evening of November 22. Stephanie was still messaging Ron and planning to end her marriage. At some point, Dale saw the unfinished love message she was working on.
Prosecutors believed that was what drove him to commit the crime. In this version, Dale struck Stephanie on the head with a heavy object, possibly the laptop, and then began strangling her. Once Stephanie lost consciousness, prosecutors believed Dale assumed she was dead or dying. He then carried her out of the house and took her to the nearby river, where he left her in the freezing water before disposing of the laptop, her phone, and anything else that could have helped investigators reconstruct what had happened.
Stephanie, however, was still alive when he left her there. By that point, there was no way to know how long she had survived before dying. Dale’s trial began in the summer of 2012, and the defense focused heavily on the complete absence of direct evidence linking him to Stephanie’s murder. His lawyers reminded the jury that police had never been able to determine exactly where the attack occurred.
There was no blood or other clear evidence of a struggle inside the house. No murder weapon was found, and there was no foreign DNA on Stephanie’s body tying Dale to the crime. Investigators also found no tracks in the snow indicating he had carried her body toward the river. The defense also criticized how police had handled the investigation.
While Stephanie was still considered missing, the house had not been treated as a crime scene and had not been properly secured. One investigator later admitted that when he first searched the house, he saw no signs of a struggle or cleaning. According to Dale’s lawyer, police had decided very early on that the husband was responsible and then began looking at almost everything through that assumption. The defense also brought Ron and Cynthia back into the picture, arguing that there was no direct evidence exonerating the couple any more than there was evidence proving Dale had killed Stephanie.
Even Dale’s unusually calm behavior after Stephanie’s disappearance had, according to the defense, a much simpler explanation. At that time, the couple had separated and reconciled several times. So, his lawyers argued, Dale may have genuinely believed Stephanie had left home again and would eventually come back. They also tried to discredit the testimony of Dale’s former girlfriends by pointing out that the incidents they described had occurred nearly twenty years before Stephanie’s death, had not been reported to police at the time, and only came to light after the murder received widespread attention.
It is also worth noting that before the trial began, Dale was offered a plea deal. If he pleaded guilty, he could have been sentenced to around twenty-four years in prison, far less than what he would face if he went to trial. But Dale flatly refused it. He told those close to him he would not confess to something he had not done and intended to beat the charges against him.
After the trial ended, the jury took only about three hours to reach a unanimous verdict. They convicted Dale on all six charges, and he was sentenced to 112 years in prison. Even after the verdict, Dale continued to deny any connection to Stephanie’s death and soon filed an appeal. He was unable to overturn his murder conviction, but his lawyers did achieve a significant reduction in his sentence.
The appeals court ruled that the two first-degree assault convictions were based on the same acts that formed part of Stephanie’s murder, meaning Dale could not be separately punished for them. Those two convictions were overturned, along with the additional 32-year sentences for each. This reduced Dale’s total sentence from 112 years to 48 years, a substantial difference, though it still meant he would likely spend most of his life in prison. Several years later, Dale tried once more to obtain a new trial, and this time the case took an unexpected turn.
In October 2019, Dale filed a petition challenging his conviction, claiming his trial lawyer had not represented him competently. Among other things, Dale claimed his lawyer had allowed the jury to hear too much about his past violent behavior and had made several other mistakes that could have affected the outcome of the trial. But by accusing his former lawyer of ineffective representation, Dale opened the door for that lawyer to reveal information previously protected by attorney-client privilege. When the lawyer was finally allowed to speak about the matter, he revealed that Dale had confessed to killing Stephanie long before the trial began.
According to the lawyer, Dale initially denied any involvement but later gave him a completely different account of what happened. Dale allegedly admitted that he strangled Stephanie until she lost consciousness, then drove her to the river and threw her body into the water. But Stephanie regained consciousness afterward, and according to the lawyer, Dale said he hit her on the head with a rock before leaving her there to die. The lawyer himself acknowledged he had no way of knowing whether Dale was telling the truth, but the confession had a significant impact on how he defended the case, because once his client admitted to the murder, he could no longer present evidence or arguments in court that he believed to be false.
So, some of the decisions Dale later described as mistakes by his lawyer were, according to that lawyer, actually influenced by the fact that he had heard his client confess. This meant the man who had spent the entire investigation, trial, and years of interviews insisting he had never hurt Stephanie had secretly admitted to killing her before the trial even began. As for Stephanie and Dale’s three children, the consequences of what happened began long before their father’s conviction. They were nine, six, and five years old when their mother died.
At first, they continued living with Dale, but investigators were concerned for their safety. The day after Stephanie’s funeral, social services removed the three children from the home and sent them to live with Stephanie’s brother and his wife in California. That remained their home in the years that followed. Dale tried to see them again in the spring of 2012 while he was still free on bail awaiting trial.
But Stephanie’s brother, the prosecutors, and the children’s representatives all opposed the request. They argued that the children had finally found a safe and stable home, and that bringing Dale back into their lives could disrupt that stability. The eldest daughter was the only one of the children to testify in the case. She was only ten years old when she appeared in her father’s court.
To protect her, she was allowed to testify by video instead of appearing in person. She told the jury about the last time she saw her mother alive and described Stephanie simply as a good person who loved to dance. Even after his conviction, Dale told reporters that if his children ever asked him whether he had killed their mother, he would be able to look them straight in the eye and tell them he had never hurt Stephanie. Dale is now sixty-three years old and remains in prison.
He will not become eligible for parole until 2045, when he will be eighty-two years old.